
An empty Town
Hall Meeting Room - prior to a Board of Selectmen's Meeting.
O
B S E R V E R C O R P S R E P O R T S
pictures here with links to: Board
of Selectmen monitoring:
Return
to "Members
Only"...or link to main LWVof Weston WEBsite
here:
W e s t o n
E - V O T E R
T A B L
E O F C O
N T E N T S
- PICTURE STORY: this page began before the Weston FORUM was
as
excellent as it is now on-line, so the League's VOTERS GUIDE is now
produced not only in the newspaper itself, but also online! Prior to
this, the webmaster produced a local election on-line
Voter's Guide for 2005!!! And, of course, we followed the Election in 2003 as well!
S
O U R C E S
Merrill proposes voting by mail
Jacqueline Rabe, CT MIRROR
February 14, 2011
A bipartisan coalition is pushing for an elections reform package that
includes a constitutional amendment to allow early voting by mail.
"We are not on the forefront of this," Secretary of the State Denise W.
Merrill said while announcing the reform package with both Republican
and Democratic lawmakers standing behind her. She said 35 states
currently allow early voting by mail.
The package also includes provisions requiring local registrars to have
an emergency plan in place if polling locations run out of ballots or
long lines form and granting the secretary of the state the authority
to require registrars order more ballots. The changes are aimed at
preventing a repeat of the Election Day fiasco of 2010, when Bridgeport
and a half dozen other communities ran out of ballots on Election Day,
does not happen again.
merrill
Leaders of the legislature's elections committee and the chief
elections officer introduce an elections reform package
The vote-by-mail proposal would require a constitutional amendment,
Merrill said, because the constitution now allows absentee voting only
for those who are ill, disabled, out of town on Election Day or barred
by their religion from participating in secular activities.
Merrill's proposal would have the General Assembly adopt the
vote-by-mail amendment and put it before the voters in the November
2012 election.
Merrill, the state's chief elections officer, said this "no excuse"
absentee ballot initiative could someday mean there will be no need for
Election Day.
"Oregon doesn't have Election Day anymore. Their election is all mail
in," she said.
Currently about 10 percent of voters use absentee ballots. Merrill's
goal is to have half of all votes cast by mail, a chance that could
eliminate long lines and polling locations running out of ballots and
make it "easier and more convenient" to vote.
Rep. Anthony T. Hwang, the Republican ranking member of the Government
Administration and Elections Committee, said these initiatives could
help guarantee that every vote counts.
"It is fundamental to the democratic process that we as a state provide
a forum, provide a setting where elections are unquestioned, elections
are transparent, honest and reflect the true intent of voters in our
community," said Hwang, R-Fairfield.
The Democratic chairs of the committee agree.
"This addresses what we all have said are some unacceptable
situations," said Sen. Gayle S. Slossberg, D-Milford, calling the
packages a "common-sense solution."
But not everyone supports these initiatives; including the Connecticut
Town Clerks Association, the State Elections Enforcement Commission,
the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities and the Council of Small
Towns.
In testimony submitted to the GAE committee, their concerns included
the difficulty towns might have administering and paying for mail-in
voting and the possibility that the integrity of the elections could be
compromised.
"Due to a significant history of enforcement actions in the absentee
ballot area, which lack the traditional controls of a polling place,
the Commission opposes No-Excuse Absentee Voting," reads the SEEC
testimony.
"Our current system for processing absentee ballots could not handle
the increase in volume under a no excuse system," said Essie Labrot,
the town clerk from West Hartford and vice chair of the CTCA. She said
additional workers would need to be hired and unless the state plans to
pay for them, this is an "unfunded mandate."
When several towns ran out of ballots mid-day last election because
they had not ordered enough ballots, chaos ensued the proponents of the
election reform package said.
"I happen to love excitement, but that was an excitement I don't want,"
said Urania Petit, the election administer for Hartford where numerous
polling locations ran out of ballots mid-day last November. "Horror
should not be part of the elections process."
To avoid towns running out of ballots, Merrill's reform package would
require towns report to her office 30 days prior to an election how
many ballots they have ordered. If her office determines they need more
ballots, Merrill's office could require towns to order more. Towns that
fail to report in time would be required to order one ballot for each
registered voter.
Asked during an interview if this package is an unfunded mandate,
Merrill said, "It's a one-page report. I hope towns would not view
needing enough ballots as a mandate."
Merrill said she does not support proposed bills that require towns to
have one ballot for each registered voter or a proposal that has the
state's public financing program pay for ballots.
Following the Bridgeport fiasco, allegations were made that the
cash-strapped city attempted to cut costs by ordering fewer ballots.
Towns currently have to pay the cost of printing official ballots.
Merrill has said she has been told that price tag can range anywhere
from 30 cents to $1 a ballot.
In an effort to reduce those costs she is considering proposing that
would allow towns to use the state's purchasing power to order ballots
at a cheaper rate by purchasing them in bulk.
"We will continue to try to get the cost down," she said. "Cost savings
is a concern but it's not the only concern... This is not about state
authority versus the towns, it’s not Republicans versus Democrats, this
is about the most important function in our democracy.”